TechOnline India Header
Most Popular
Top 5 Courses
  • Fundamentals of PCB Design
  • Fundamentals of Multicore Programming
  • Eliminating Audible Transients in Audio Systems
  • DC-DC Converter Theory
  • Fundamentals of Wireless
    Most Popular
    Top 5 Technical Papers
  • Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Guide (Part 1)
  • SDRAM Memory Systems: Architecture Overview and Design Verification
  • ARM Platform Technical Overview
  • Reference Design for a SEPIC LED Driver
  • Solving the System-Level Thermal Management Challenges of LEDs
    Most Popular
    Top 5 Webinars
  • Designing embedded HMIs and connecting them to hardware
  • Is Android the Right Foundation for Your Next Device?
  • 2009 Embedded Market Study
  • Maximizing OpenGL(R) ES 2.0 on GPUs for Embedded Applications
    All Articles Products Courses Papers VirtuaLabs Webinars
    Top Search Items
    scsi


    Techpaper Spotlight

    Wind River
    Accelerating the Development of Embedded Linux Devices with JTAG On-Chip Debugging
    /
        Login | Register | Welcome, Guest

    Topics
    POLL
    How much code have you produced in your career?
    A few KLOC
        38%
    100s of KLOC
        44%
    Millions of LOC
        11%
    A trillion
        7%
     



    WSNs: a top-down approach is needed
    Industrial Control Designline
    At the upcoming Embedded Systems Conference next month a panel will debate wireless sensor networks. Why?

    A reader sent the following letter to EE Times:

    "With regard to ESC: Panel to debate wireless sensor networks:

    I'm fascinated by wireless sensor networks and I believe they are the next revolution after the internet. Based on the fact that most current sensor networks are not mature, I just have a general question: what is the overall blueprint for sensor networks?

    We can discuss all of the details of power consumption, RF interference, cost, performance, but I believe there should be a top-down effort rather than a bottom-up effort. Different applications have different requirements and if we don't have a big picture from the top it is not meaningful to discuss the details.

    I also believe this should be a coordinated effort involving nanotechnology, biotechnology, new energy such as solar panel, DSP, networking, power management, etc. Applications can be divided by industries and then probably a roadmap should first be rolled out. "

    The reader, Xiaoyauan Qi, is an engineer located in San Antonio, Texas.

    Here in Manhasset, we agree.

    What do you think?

    1
     
     
    Latest Webinars
    · The Next Generation of Ethernet: How the New IEEE Standards Enable Energy Efficiency and Quality-of-Service
    · Simplified Physical Layer Receiver Test of Re-timed Architectures Such as USB 3.0, SATA, SAS, PCIe 2
    · How to solve the most common high-speed bus issues in embedded design on a budget
    · Early access to ARM Core Technology with Fast Models from ARM
    · Latest MIPI Standards: PHY and Protocol Testing Guidance
     
    Member Company Spotlight
    Xilinx
     

    Start Your Spartan-3A FPGA DSP Design Now! Evaluate Free Downloadable Tools Built Just for You.


    Member Companies